"America was originally designed to operate a very limited government. Such a limited government cannot care for the survival needs of the populace, but depends on the goodness of its people to support each other in times of need. Without a strong moral fibre or tight social bonds, we inevitably turn to the government to meet our collective needs, and our politicians oblige us, enabling our addiction to easy public services.
The sword of moral fibre cuts both ways. As the people's moral code grows ever weaker, so do the morals of our leaders. This code that once encouraged self sufficiency and dominion over your own life has given way to a code that encourages dependence, allowed by the weak fibre of our so-called "leaders." The ability to take care of yourself and your family was once highly prized. Today, many pass that responsibility to their elected officials, who are only too happy to promise more services in exchange for votes.
Our leaders are in the process of creating a society of incompetence, a society of dependence, a society that would utterly collapse without the constant support and nurturing of a paternalistic government. Most institutions eventually outlive their usefulness, and continue to exist only to prolong their existence. Our government should be no different.
It is only with the highest resolve and integrity that we could maintain a government that stays a blessing, instead of becoming a burden. We have lost that resolve, as our leaders offer us more and more services for "free." We have come to expect the government to care for us, and are losing the ability to care for ourselves. We have forsaken the morals of our ancestors by taking the "easy way."
In many cases, morality amounts to self denial. You may have the urge to steal some trinket, but morality dictates you must not. You may have the urge to sleep with your friend's wife, but morality dictates you must not. You may have the urge to pass the responsibility of caring for yourself and your community to the government, but morality dictates you must not. It is this denial of the easy route that creates a strong culture, one that can face difficult challenges and succeed.
Our tremendous wealth has made us soft. We no longer NEED to deny our urges, we have money to burn, and when the money runs out, credit cards. We are constantly bombarded with commercial messages telling us to buy, buy, buy. Before long, this consumer pattern leaves us broke and owing thousands to credit card companies. And we turn to the government for help, our hands out, begging for relief from the problems we created with our need to have things now, now, now.
And the government, as a reflection of the people, is just as bad. Our desire to have an unstoppable armed force, and a social safety net, along with the host of other spending, now including, a corporate safety net. These enabling institutions insulate us from the consequences of poor decisions, and are paid for on credit. And as the consequences pile up, more institutions are needed to "correct the wrongs," and more debt to pay for them. It is a seemingly endless spiral, one that we can pull out of only with severe self-denial for the things we want, but don't need, or can't afford.
It is not too late. We are still a great nation, but our priorities have been corrupted by money and power. The decadent lifestyle we cling to is quickly eroding, as our government dances faster and faster to maintain the status quo. But we can all see where this is going.
The change cannot come from the top. Our president can talk about change until he is blue in the face, but real change comes from the bottom. From each of us, making the prudent decision, forgoing the easy route, even when we don't have to, because moral people do what is right, even when it hurts."
Friday, January 15, 2010
Doing What is Right - Even When it Hurts
I was involved in a discussion on one of my favorite forums yesterday (Common Sense by Dan Carlin). One of the contributors posted a comment that I really liked. He also posted to his blog newsgangster.blogspot.com Here it is:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)



6 comments:
Several of the recent posts have reminded me of what Elder D. Todd Christofferson said last October in a talk entitled "Moral Discipline." Here's a section of it:
"The societies in which many of us live have for more than a generation failed to foster moral discipline. They have taught that truth is relative and that everyone decides for himself or herself what is right. Concepts such as sin and wrong have been condemned as “value judgments.” . . . As a consequence, self-discipline has eroded and societies are left to try to maintain order and civility by compulsion. The lack of internal control by individuals breeds external control by governments. One columnist observed that “gentlemanly behavior [for example, once] protected women from coarse behavior. Today, we expect sexual harassment laws to restrain coarse behavior. . . .
“Policemen and laws can never replace customs, traditions and moral values as a means for regulating human behavior. At best, the police and criminal justice system are the last desperate line of defense for a civilized society. Our increased reliance on laws to regulate behavior is a measure of how uncivilized we’ve become.
"In most of the world, we have been experiencing an extended and devastating economic recession. It was brought on by multiple causes, but one of the major causes was widespread dishonest and unethical conduct, particularly in the U.S. housing and financial markets. Reactions have focused on enacting more and stronger regulation. Perhaps that may dissuade some from unprincipled conduct, but others will simply get more creative in their circumvention. There could never be enough rules so finely crafted as to anticipate and cover every situation, and even if there were, enforcement would be impossibly expensive and burdensome. This approach leads to diminished freedom for everyone. . . .
"In the end, it is only an internal moral compass in each individual that can effectively deal with the root causes as well as the symptoms of societal decay. Societies will struggle in vain to establish the common good until sin is denounced as sin and moral discipline takes its place in the pantheon of civic virtues."
What a great comment MJ. It makes me want to go listen to conference again. It also reminds me that I do not have to reinvent the wheel as I am trying to construct an argument to defend my thesis. Men much wiser than myself have already laid out the case. Thanks again
I posted a comment, but it didn't make it. I'll try again. I am to the point where I don't believe there is much I can do. I'm not saying that I have given up, I just think we are so far down the wrong road that all we can do is fight for what is right and buy time. Not to get all churchy, but the signs of the times are among us in great abundance. I think that we are left fighting just to save a few. That's my take.
Ok, on a different note regarding moral discipline. I am seriously fed up with the welfare system. SERIOUSLY. It has to be the most corrput and dishonestly taken advange of program that exists. I have SOOOOO many examples of people abusing the system, when I say sooo many, I am serious, countless. Anyway, I have a "Friend" who is a military wife. The way that the military breaks things down as far as payment goes, leaves a lot of people eligible for welfare and WIC. They give "allowances" so they have their set income, but then they have housing allowances, and allowances for additional kids, and bonues etc. I am not saying that they get paid what they should, I am just saying that thier "income" doesn't reflect their take-home. So this "friend" has a brand new surburban that is loaded, she has a Thule car topper, she just purchased a DSLR camera that ended up costing them of $1000. Nothing is wrong with this, except for the fact that their family is on WIC. Just because she quailfies doesn't make it morally right or acceptable. To take things one step further, she snickers and thinks it is funny. She also is having a difficult time with encouraging her husband to be promoted in the military because then they would no longer qualify for WIC! Unbelievable. You want to stifle your husbands growth so you can get government milk and cheese, lovely. Last time I checked, my husband makes a nice income, but we don't have a DSLR or a Thule car topper, or a loaded surburban. You know why? Because I can't afford it, and why can't I afford it, because I pay my taxes and my taxes go to people like her. It makes me sick.
Great thoughts Jen...this is exactly what Elder Christofferson was talking about in MJ's post. In his talk to BYU Robert P. George said:
"If you're a government and you're trying to govern an utterly lawless people, an utterly immoral people, people who only respect the law because of the fear of punishment, it won't work. Legal philosophers have long known that the law will work only when the majority of people are obeying the law out of moral conviction and not simply out of fear of punishment"
I share your sentiments with respect to government sponsored 'welfare'. I really don't know what the solution is outside of each member of society developing a stronger moral fiber.
The problem, as I see it is two-fold: There are those who have legitimate needs. As we fail as a people to voluntarily assist those in need, government intrusion is inevitable.
On the other hand there are those who have sufficient, but covet the posessions of others (your friend being an example). Government essentially buys power by giving them what they want, but don't really need.
In either case we are gradually enslaving ourselves by enabling the growth of an all-powerful state that will inevitably pursue ends contrary to those which we desire. Socialism truly is the 'Road to Serfdom' (borrowed that phrase from Hayek:-)
Here's another statement of uncertain origin, but very appropriate:
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury. After that, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits with the result the democracy collapses because of the loose fiscal policy ensuing, always to be followed by a dictatorship, then a monarchy."
The gospel is the answer!!
After reading about Jen's friend, I couldn't help but add my own contradictory example, perhaps to give her evidence that there is hope.
My brother has a large family and a large mortgage. He purchased a modest home a few years ago in an area with inflated housing prices (similar to California). My sister is a mortgage loan officer. Recently my sister was telling my brother that she could bring his interest rate down significantly if he refinanced. He considered and then turned her down. My initial reaction was thinking he was crazy so I asked him why he was choosing to keep the higher interest rate. He said simply, "That's bailout money. I can pay my mortgage."
I admire that kind of foresight and resolve. I doubt most people would have even thought about where the lower rate was coming from. Taxpayers ultimately. Even if they had thought about that, wouldn't it be tempting to just take what you can get because that is the culture we are living in? I admit, a part of me would sure like to milk the system for all it's worth because that is what I see happening around me. Sigh, darn morals. :)
I actually do have ONE welfare success story. I had a friend whose husband started to physically abuse her after they got married. She was pregnant and realized she couldn't bring a child into the situation. So, 6 months pregnant, she left him. She moved into section A housing, lived off of welfare and put herself through beauty school. As soon as she was on her feet, she got off the system. I am pretty sure she was on the system for approx 1 1/2 years. You see, people like her use the system properly and then give back 10 fold. I wish there were more stories like hers....
Post a Comment